Scrutinel— 2026 midterms

UpdatedOct 10, 2026, 11:27 AM EDT
To election day24 days
Simulations200,000

Wisconsin 4th District

Currently held by a Democrat · incumbent running

Democrat
Gwen Moore
>99.9%
Republican
Tim Rogers
<0.1%
ForecastSafe D
Projected margin
D+59.1
80% range
D+47.7 to D+70.7
Partisan lean
D+53.1
Uncertainty multiplier
1.80×

The 80% range comes from 200,000 simulations in which this race’s error is correlated with every other race through the national, state and demographic layers.

How the estimate is built
Fundamentals >99.9%
Polling average
no polls
Fundamentals
D+59.4
Blended
D+59.4
Similar-race shift
−2.5
Polling

No public polling of this matchup. The forecast rests on fundamentals plus the polling residuals of demographically and politically similar races — which is the normal case: most of the 435 House seats are never polled.

Fundamentals
Partisan lean
D+53.1
Elasticity
0.89
Incumbency
+3.4
Candidate experience
0.0
Fundraising
+4.1
National environment
D+7.1
Expected margin
D+61.8
How it voted for presidenttwo-party
2024 margin
D+52.5
2020 margin
D+53.7
Shift 2020 → 2024
R+1.3
Votes cast, 2024
345,704

Presidential results reaggregated onto the 2026 district lines. This is where the seat’s partisan lean comes from, and it carries most of the forecast in a race nobody has polled.

Who lives hereCensus ACS
Population
558,133
Median age
44.3
Median household income
$55,400
Bachelor’s degree or higher
33%
White
47%
Black
31%
Hispanic
15%
Asian
5%

Used to find demographically similar districts, so a race with no polling can borrow the polling error of races that look like it.

Campaign fundraisingFEC filings to Invalid Date
CandidatePartyRaisedCash on hand
Gwen S MooreDEM$1.1M$29k
Purnima NathREP$2k$5k

Receipts across the cycle, from FEC bulk filings. The model uses the ratio between the two sides rather than either total, and weights it lightly — money follows a competitive race at least as much as it causes one.

← Back to the full forecast