Scrutinel— 2026 midterms

UpdatedOct 10, 2026, 11:27 AM EDT
To election day24 days
Simulations200,000

Iowa 4th District

Currently held by a Republican · open seat

Democrat
Dave Dawson
1%
Republican
Chris McGowan
99%
ForecastSafe R
Projected margin
R+24.7
80% range
R+37.1 to R+12.2
Partisan lean
R+30.2
Uncertainty multiplier
2.01×

The 80% range comes from 200,000 simulations in which this race’s error is correlated with every other race through the national, state and demographic layers.

How the estimate is built
Fundamentals >99.9%
Polling average
no polls
Fundamentals
R+24.4
Blended
R+24.4
Similar-race shift
+1.7
Polling

No public polling of this matchup. The forecast rests on fundamentals plus the polling residuals of demographically and politically similar races — which is the normal case: most of the 435 House seats are never polled.

Fundamentals
Partisan lean
R+30.2
Elasticity
1.01
Incumbency
0.0
Candidate experience
0.0
Fundraising
−2.6
National environment
D+7.1
Expected margin
R+26.1
How it voted for presidenttwo-party
2024 margin
R+31.9
2020 margin
R+26.5
Shift 2020 → 2024
R+5.4
Votes cast, 2024
393,510

Presidential results reaggregated onto the 2026 district lines. This is where the seat’s partisan lean comes from, and it carries most of the forecast in a race nobody has polled.

Who lives hereCensus ACS
Population
613,517
Median age
50.4
Median household income
$68,100
Bachelor’s degree or higher
26%
White
85%
Black
2%
Hispanic
8%
Asian
2%

Used to find demographically similar districts, so a race with no polling can borrow the polling error of races that look like it.

Campaign fundraisingFEC filings to Invalid Date
CandidatePartyRaisedCash on hand
Chris McgowanREP$680k$329k
Dave DawsonDEM$136k$50k

Receipts across the cycle, from FEC bulk filings. The model uses the ratio between the two sides rather than either total, and weights it lightly — money follows a competitive race at least as much as it causes one.

← Back to the full forecast