Scrutinel— 2026 midterms

UpdatedOct 10, 2026, 11:27 AM EDT
To election day24 days
Simulations200,000

Alabama 3rd District

Currently held by a Republican · incumbent running · district redrawn for 2026

Democrat
Lee McInnis
<0.1%
Republican
Mike Rogers
>99.9%
ForecastSafe R
Projected margin
R+42.5
80% range
R+54.0 to R+31.0
Partisan lean
R+45.3
Uncertainty multiplier
1.80×

The 80% range comes from 200,000 simulations in which this race’s error is correlated with every other race through the national, state and demographic layers.

How the estimate is built
Fundamentals >99.9%
Polling average
no polls
Fundamentals
R+42.3
Blended
R+42.3
Similar-race shift
+2.4
Polling

No public polling of this matchup. The forecast rests on fundamentals plus the polling residuals of demographically and politically similar races — which is the normal case: most of the 435 House seats are never polled.

Fundamentals
Partisan lean
R+45.3
Elasticity
1.02
Incumbency
−1.9
Candidate experience
0.0
Fundraising
−3.8
National environment
D+7.1
Expected margin
R+44.7
How it voted for presidenttwo-party
2024 margin
R+47.0
2020 margin
R+41.4
Shift 2020 → 2024
R+5.6
Votes cast, 2024
316,410

Presidential results reaggregated onto the 2026 district lines. This is where the seat’s partisan lean comes from, and it carries most of the forecast in a race nobody has polled.

Who lives hereCensus ACS
Population
564,595
Median age
49.5
Median household income
$55,900
Bachelor’s degree or higher
23%
White
72%
Black
21%
Hispanic
3%
Asian
2%

Used to find demographically similar districts, so a race with no polling can borrow the polling error of races that look like it.

Campaign fundraisingFEC filings to Invalid Date
CandidatePartyRaisedCash on hand
Michael RogersREP$2.1M$2.6M
Victor Lee McinnisDEM$61k$9k

Receipts across the cycle, from FEC bulk filings. The model uses the ratio between the two sides rather than either total, and weights it lightly — money follows a competitive race at least as much as it causes one.

← Back to the full forecast